(Reprints: Judge Death
stories from Judge Dredd Megazine
#1.01-1.12, 2.15 and 209-216 and 2000 AD Prog 1289-1294, and Judge Dredd stories from 2000 AD
Prog 1114-1115 and 1168)
This week, I've got the honor of discussing Judge Death:
The Life and Death of... with David Brothers of 4thletter!
DOUGLAS: David asked me for some background on how exactly
this volume fits into the Dredd-matrix, so here's my statement of context: this
is a weird goddamn book. The Life and Death of... is sort of the missing half of Death Lives, which came out at the beginning of the Simon &
Schuster/2000 AD program in 2010. And the reason it's a companion piece is that
John Wagner has been very very careful about not overusing Judge Death, but
maybe not quite careful enough.
For a character who's central to the way people think about
Dredd, Judge Death has had relatively little on-panel time--he's not like the
Joker or Lex Luthor or Magneto, popping up twice a month. After his first two,
brief, Brian Bolland-drawn appearances, in 1980 and 1981 (both in Death
Lives), he appeared in a Judge Anderson
story in 1985, then wasn't seen until the long "Necropolis"/"Theatre
of Death" sequence in 1990. (There's also a ten-page story from 1991
that's a flashback to "Necropolis"; I'll get around to that in
January, I believe.) In all of those appearances, he's a figure of total terror;
he and his associates slaughter (many) millions of people over the course of
"Necropolis," and the moment where he shows up in that story is
really where the hammer comes down.
"Young Death," the first story included here, was
serialized over the first year's worth of Judge Dredd Megazine, which launched immediately before the end of
"Necropolis." As you can see, it sort of transformed Judge Death into
a sitcom character, "Mr. De'Ath" with his ridiculously
uncomprehending landlady. Incidentally, if it's unclear how he went from "still
at large" at the end of "Young Death" to "in
captivity" as of "Tea with Mrs. Gunderson," that's because of a
curious aspect of the Judge Dredd
intercompany crossovers: they're all in continuity. Anderson captures and
confines Death at the end of the first Batman/Judge Dredd one-shot, Judgement on Gotham, which came out at the end of 1991, shortly after
the end of "Young Death."
After that, Death spent most of the '90s appearing in
relatively short, relatively funny stories, or in flashbacks, or (as with
"Death Becomes Him") as an offstage presence. The post-Judgement
on Gotham sequence goes "Tea with Mrs.
Gunderson" (here, 1992), then three stories collected in Death
Lives ("Judge Death: The True
Story" from 1994, "The Three Amigos" from 1995, and "Dead
Reckoning" from 1996), then "Death Becomes Him" (here, 1997),
then the final Batman/Dredd team-up, Die Laughing (1998). "A Night with Judge Death" (here,
1999) was the last of the stories where his spirit is hanging around Mrs.
Gunderson's place, although she kept appearing elsewhere for another few years.
(In this interview,
Wagner indicates that she's based on his mother!)
For the past decade, we've seen relatively little of Judge
Death. The two long black-and-white stories here that Frazer Irving drew, from
2002 and 2003-2004, respectively, are just about it, aside from a Judge
Anderson story, "Half Life," that ran at the same time as "The
Wilderness Days" and got her out of her coma. (I haven't read it.) The end
of "The Wilderness Days," in other words, is the last we've seen of
him; we don't see a body or anything (as if we could), but it does seem at
least moderately final.
That has to be by design: Wagner has indicated
that he's done with the character. The problem with Judge Death is that there's
no way to effectively de-escalate the scale of his stories. His first four
appearances were each increasingly huger and scarier--"Necropolis" is
maybe where the series' stakes feel highest ("Judgement Day" has a
higher body count, but less of a sense of the roof falling in). After that, any
straightforward follow-up would have just been a lesser duplicate of
"Necropolis," so there was nothing left to do with Death except
examining his wake and burlesquing his scariness. Wagner did both of those
nicely for a while; he's very good at burlesquing things, including his own
work. But I think he's decided that, as much as readers love Judge Death, he's
gone as far as he can go.
So I haven't even talked about the actual comics in here yet
(as a trick to make you talk about them). What's your take, David?
DAVID: Douglas, weird is
the perfect word for the book. I picked up The Life and
Death Of... expecting to
read a few short tales of skin-crawling terror or overt horror. I've read
a few Judge Death stories, and he always came across as the ultimate in bad guys,
a nuclear apocalypse in the form of a man. Not so much a character that you
could dig into as a (pardon the cliché) force of nature. When he arrives,
things go south, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. His presence
should seem like a big deal, and The Life and Death Of... feels like it exists solely to deflate that
aspect of his character.
I think the parts of
the book that work the best are the ones that hearken back to the really scary
aspects of Judge Death. I quite liked "Death Becomes Him," and
particularly Gary Caldwell's strange, muted palette. I like the idea of Judge
Death as an infectious agent, something that poisons everything he touches and
whose influence is felt long after he's gone. It's a creepy little idea, and
one that's pretty well-executed here.
The last page of
"My Name Is Death" is fantastic, too. It's successful in a way that I
never really saw in the rest of the story. Judge Death tearing through a juve
home should have been much scarier than it was. Instead, it felt kind of rote,
as if Wagner and Irving were going through the motions to set up a story down
the line. But again, that last page, with Death walking the Cursed Earth and
quietly going about his business, is exactly what I was hoping to see.
I think the weirdest
part of this book is how "Young Death" seems like it should change
Death from a flat character to more rounded one, but that transition never
really happens. Not that I can tell, at any rate. We get Judge Death's origin
and we see him out of sorts, and those moments are normally used to reveal
secret truths about a character. Instead, they just confirm what we already
know. Yep, he's evil. Always been evil, ayup. He hates torture, yessir, except
when he doesn't. (Which was another weird thing about the book--Death
contradicts himself when talking about how he feels about torture for some
reason.) There aren't any revelations here, just confirmations. Those
confirmations take some of the air out of Judge Death's sails. When his past
was mostly unknown, he was scary. The more they reveal the reasons for his
actions, the less scary he becomes. He went from flat force of nature to flat
absurd character.
I feel like I'm
criticizing the book for the wrong reasons ("It's not scary enough! Why
are these stories so funny?!"), but Judge Death's transformation into a
sitcom character in "Young Death" is a tough one to reconcile. I like
the idea that Judge Death wanted to teach people about his goals in the hopes
that they would convert to his cause and presumably join some type of Death
cult. That idea was buried under the increasingly ridiculous scenes of Sidney
Death's origin and a few tired sitcom landlord/old lady jokes. I mean, Judge
Death bumming rent money--it's a bit much, right? It's hard for me to buy this
Judge Death as the same one that turned Mega City One into a Necropolis. He's
missing the eagerness and willingness to kill that made him a real threat.
The Life And Death
Of... is particularly
interesting in light of your comments about Wagner being tired of the
character. The publication timeline is a little too long for this to be true,
but the majority of the book feels like Wagner's attempt to bury his own
character. "Death Becomes Him" is the sole exception, I think, but
the others, with their sitcom antics and Las Vegas boxing, feel like attempts
to turn Death absurd, rather than scary. You have a good point with the
burlesque aspect of things, but I think Wagner actually takes it into the area
of killing Judge Death's credibility. Death comes across as a joke, or at least
an object of mockery, in most of these stories. All of that is intentional,
sure, but it feels like a burial, rather than simply a series of jokes.
"I'm sick of this character, but you guys want him... do you want him now?"
Am I totally off-base
there? I think you're correct in saying that using Judge Death as he was in
"Necropolis" would have just been diminishing returns, and that
colors my opinion of these stories. Is it better to fade out and turn into a
parody of yourself like the Joker or just to fade into the background? Wagner
chose a third route, something like "This guy is actually pretty silly, so
we're not going to play him straight any more."
I think "Death
Becomes Him" and parts of "My Name Is Death" hit me the hardest,
and "Young Death" was pretty entertaining. Was your experience
similar?
DOUGLAS: As far as writing goes, "Death Becomes
Him" is my favorite thing here--one thing Wagner does incredibly well is
write about how the way major events are understood changes as they recede into
history. "Death Becomes Him" is eight years out from the end of
"Necropolis," seven years from the end of "Young Death";
Judge Death is understood as "an awful thing that happened a while
ago," and his image has turned into a tourist attraction, something to
scare the rubes with--but his presence, and what he actually did, is so
horrible that it still lingers and corrupts everything that happens where it
was. "Infectious agent" is exactly right.
"A Night with Judge Death" makes the same point considerably less effectively. (It does highlight another way that Judge Dredd likes to play with the ramifications of big events--the "Second Robot War" it mentions was part of the lengthy "Doomsday Scenario" storyline that had ended a couple of weeks earlier.) And I just realized that the episode that ran the following week also had a final scene set at Mrs. Gunderson's place: I don't think it's ever been reprinted, but Wagner's script for it is online.
And while I don't think I could handle Mrs. Gunderson very often, I do like most of her scenes with Judge Death; I like the idea that she survives everything just by being cheerful and completely oblivious to what's going on. Which is why "Tea with Mrs. Gunderson" really doesn't work at all for me. If his whole routine is "the crime is life, the sentence is death," then he can't exactly find her innocent, can he?
"The Wilderness Days" seems really off-kilter, too: I agree that by that point it's Wagner saying "do you still want him now?" The "Natural Born Killers" parody never even starts to find its footing; the vaguely "Dr. Strangelove"-ish ending doesn't really connect either, and having Death dragged off to hell by one of Wagner's Cursed Earth central-casting hillbillies is dopey and unconvincing. "You cannot kill what does not live" is a great catch-phrase, but it also means there's never a real threat that the character can be taken off the board for keeps.
"The Wilderness Days" seems really off-kilter, too: I agree that by that point it's Wagner saying "do you still want him now?" The "Natural Born Killers" parody never even starts to find its footing; the vaguely "Dr. Strangelove"-ish ending doesn't really connect either, and having Death dragged off to hell by one of Wagner's Cursed Earth central-casting hillbillies is dopey and unconvincing. "You cannot kill what does not live" is a great catch-phrase, but it also means there's never a real threat that the character can be taken off the board for keeps.
But that's all writing; there's some very interesting visual stuff going on through most of
this volume, especially the two long sequences Frazer Irving drew in that crazy
early quasi-woodcut style of his. I've been reading the long interview with him
in the new Modern Masters book
about his work, and there's a quote I like from him: "In work where the
color is absent or muted, the line takes on the additional role of doing the
mood enhancing that the color normally would." The way he treats light in
these stories is very, very clever: most of the scenes in "My Name Is
Death" are set in the dark, and there's usually one incredibly bright
light source that's blasting its rays across the visual field. (On top of that,
the presence of Judge Death warps the path of light itself.) And then most of
"The Wilderness Days" is set in the very bright daytime of the
American Southwest, which does effectively the same thing. Also, check out
Irving's tribute to a very familiar non-Dredd-related image by Judge Death's
creator Brian Bolland...
I really like the look of Alex Ronald's artwork in
"Death Becomes Him," too--it's much less dramatic than Irving's, but
fragile and sooty in a way that suits the story (and I agree with you that the
coloring's on point there). Peter Doherty's work on "Young Death" is
very odd: really gorgeous color and textures that cover up for figure work
that's a little bit iffy. According to this
interview with him, it was actually his first professional assignment as an
artist, and you can tell he's working out a lot of what he's doing as he goes
along--the scene with Sidney's dog looks a lot like Sam Kieth's stuff to me.
Really, in general, the artwork in early-'90s 2000 AD and Megazine looks a lot better and livelier to me than most of the American comics
that are coming out now. I gather from Thrill-Power Overload that the budget for the early Megazine was pretty high by the standards of the time; I
wonder if the only difference is page rates, or if there was actually a broader
range of styles that was acceptable for that time and place's idea of
"mainstream comics." Did anything in particular strike you as
interesting about the look of this stuff?
DAVID: I think the
most interesting thing about the art is how varied it is. Which is kind of an
ignorant thing for me to say, particularly in light of the fact I own a couple
of the Mega-City Masters
volumes, but when I think of Dredd and Dredd-related material, my mental image
always goes to Carlos Ezquerra or Steve Dillon first. It's like how the name
"Spider-Man" conjures Steve Ditko, John Romita Sr., and then Todd
McFarlane first and foremost for me. So the diversity of art in this collection
was a pleasant surprise for entirely banal reasons on my part. I quite liked
seeing Dean Ormston colored like Simon Bisley and black and white art from
Frazer Irving.
I was expecting to
like Frazer Irving's half of the book the most. I was introduced to his art on Silent
War, his strange and beautiful
collaboration with David Hine during Civil War-era Marvel, and I've greatly enjoyed what he's
done since, from Gutsville on
through to Xombi. In the end,
though, I was most impressed by Alex Ronald on "Death Becomes Him."
The dry and dusty palette fits Ronald's stick legs and realistic faces very
well. Things like Chuck Quite's kind smile in Quite Nice Bar or Giff attempting
to calm down after freaking out that first time were very well done.
Irving's
black-and-white art took some getting used to. I had a little trouble with the
storytelling in a panel here and there, but once I adjusted, I found a lot to
enjoy. There's a very good panel partway through "My Name Is Death"
that appears just after Death wipes out the first dorm. Judge Caldero discovers
Death on the linkway, and Irving renders Death as a shadow among shadows in the
gloom of the fog. Death is obviously humanoid, but the darkness intersects his
body in such a way that the shadows almost seem to emanate from him, rather
than from the night. And the next panel--Caldero's Riot Blaster shot is drawn
as two straight lines, but the light source Irving throws on the image makes
the shot look like a huge and messy laser blast. It lights Death up in a very
cool way, too. His badge and the bones on his shoulder pads are crystal clear.
I'm wondering if these were originally printed on glossy paper. I'm curious to
see how they'd look on something more coarse and matte.
The visual contrast
between "My Name Is Death" and "The Wilderness Days" is
fascinating. They feel like two sides of one coin, with "My Name Is
Death" being dominated by black and "The Wilderness Days" being
mostly white. Daytime versus nighttime, essentially. But Irving uses a few
techniques in "The Wilderness Days" that I enjoy quite a bit. He
sketches out the idea of clouds, smoke, speed, and a lot of other things with
these harsh, thin, uneven, and kinda-sorta straight lines. The two pages
beginning with Hocus Ritter leaving his son at a homestead were particularly
effective. The graves are made of lines that are thicker at one end than the
other, creating the illusion of a curve, the ground is a loose collection of
roughly parallel lines, and shadows are just slightly off that same parallel.
Most of the lines are the same weight, especially on the next page, but Irving
still manages to use angles and the ghost of shapes to get across exactly what
he wants to portray. I especially like how the windshield on the natural born
killers' car sits in contrast to the rest of that panel.
Quick sidebar: Judge
Death kicking a broken four-wheeler and then hitchhiking with a smile is
another dissonant sitcom moment, another strip of menace pulled right off the
character's back.
I almost can't imagine
Irving's pages in color. They're clearly by Irving, but they feel so different
that I can't see his palettes over the top of them. They seem like they'd only
work as black and white pages, considering the way he uses light and shadow.
This isn't a complaint, of course. I'm just trying to reconcile this Irving
with the Irving of, say, Batman & Robin.
I absolutely agree
with your assessment of Peter Doherty's "Young Death." The two-page
sequence where Brian Skuter enters Gunderson's apartment and meets Jay De'Ath
is fantastic. It's colored like a sunset, with bright yellow fading to
reddish-orange and then on down to black. In fact, the reddish panel where
Skuter inspects the habhold is very impressive. There's a bit of green on the
floors and a light purple in the sky. I like the coloring in this one much more
than the line art, which I found pretty shaky. I found another interesting
point from that interview--Doherty colored Darrow's Shaolin Cowboy! I quite liked how that series looked on about
every possible level, so that was very cool to see.
It's sort of funny
that the story I liked the least looked the most like an American comic from
the Marvel Knights era, an era that helped bring me back into comics. Andy
Clarke and S. Baskerville's work on "A Night With Judge Death"
reminded me entirely too much of the story early on in Brian Michael Bendis's
run on Daredevil that
featured art from Manuel Gutierrez and Terry & Rachel Dodson. Something
about that story felt very fake and plasticky, and the same holds true for
"A Night With Judge Death." It doesn't feel like it fits in with
these other stories, despite the disparate art styles already on display.
DOUGLAS: I'm right there with you! As far as the range of
styles on display... there's always been a pretty broad visual range in Judge
Dredd stories proper, but there are also
some drawing styles that don't seem to work as well for the main series. I
can't see the kind of ultra-stylized, whole-bottle-of-ink technique Irving uses
to such impressive effect here working for an actual Dredd serial (although he does seem to modify his style
for every project he works on--and I'll second your cheers for Hine and
Irving's Silent War). I'll also
note that Doherty's been Darrow's regular collaborator for a while--you can see
how their styles have merged a bit in this
recent Dredd sequence--and that he went on to draw a bunch of Dredd
material, including one of the best-loved stories that's never appeared in a
book, "Bury My Knee at Wounded Heart."
Thanks again to David for joining me this week. Next week:
Alyssa Rosenberg and I discuss America,
which may be my favorite Judge Dredd-related
book to date--the collection of the first three serials about the doomed
romance of Benny Beeny and America Jara, and what came of it.
Thanks guys, this was top notch.
ReplyDeleteDo you intend on reviewing Death Lives at some point?
ReplyDeleteTomorrowboy: yes, that's scheduled for May, thanks to my ingenious "all books in order of earliest story we haven't covered yet" scheme.
DeleteTechnically there's a one pager in that volume from prog 521, but I guess you're going by "actual stories" : )
DeleteIt just seemed kind of strange, because some of the stories happen before the stuff you're reviewing here. I guess that's the problem with the themed collections. Anyway, keep up the good work!